South Carolina Power Grid: Blackout Risk & Energy Outlook

South Carolina's SERC-region grid carries the financial and operational scars of the V.C. Summer nuclear construction failure—a $9 billion loss—while the state's remaining nuclear fleet and military base demand create both reliability needs and investment caution in the post-scandal regulatory environment.

Last updated: 2026-02-02 · Data: EIA, NERC, state utility commission filings

Meta description: South Carolina grid risk analysis: nuclear dependence, V.C. Summer fallout, and military base vulnerabilities. Infrastructure investment outlook for the Palmetto State.

The Grid Reality in South Carolina

South Carolina operates within the SERC Reliability Corporation's Southeast region, part of the broader Eastern Interconnection that spans from the Atlantic to the Rocky Mountains. The state's 23,800 MW of generating capacity serves 5.2 million residents through a grid dominated by nuclear power — one of the most nuclear-dependent states in America.

Nuclear plants provide roughly 60% of South Carolina's electricity generation, primarily from the V.C. Summer Nuclear Station and Oconee Nuclear Station. Natural gas accounts for about 25%, with coal, hydroelectric, and solar making up the remainder. This heavy nuclear reliance creates both stability and vulnerability — nuclear provides reliable baseload power but concentrates risk in aging facilities requiring massive capital for maintenance and eventual replacement.

The state's peak summer demand typically reaches 21,000 MW, leaving a comfortable reserve margin under normal conditions. However, South Carolina imports electricity during high-demand periods, making it vulnerable to regional transmission constraints and neighboring states' grid stress.

Key Vulnerabilities

Nuclear Plant Aging: South Carolina's nuclear fleet averages 35+ years in operation. The Oconee units date to the 1970s, while V.C. Summer Unit 1 began commercial operation in 1984. License extensions keep these plants running, but aging infrastructure requires increasing maintenance and creates outage risks.

V.C. Summer Legacy: The abandoned V.C. Summer Units 2 & 3 nuclear project — cancelled in 2017 after $9 billion in spending — left ratepayers with massive debt burdens and utilities with damaged balance sheets. This financial overhang constrains new generation investment.

Hurricane Exposure: The state's coastal location makes it vulnerable to major hurricanes that can knock out transmission lines and generation facilities. Hurricane Hugo (1989) and Florence (2018) demonstrated the grid's vulnerability to extended outages.

Military Base Dependencies: South Carolina hosts major military installations including Shaw Air Force Base, Fort Jackson, and the Charleston Naval Base. Grid failures affecting these facilities create national security implications beyond typical customer impacts.

Limited Fuel Diversity: With 85% of generation from nuclear and natural gas, South Carolina has limited fuel diversity compared to states with more coal, renewables, or oil backup generation.

The Demand Surge

South Carolina's electricity demand is growing at 1.8% annually, driven by population migration from higher-cost Northeast states and expanding industrial operations. The state added 90,000 residents in 2024, with the Charleston and Greenville metros leading growth.

Data center development is accelerating along the I-85 corridor, attracted by low electricity costs and proximity to major population centers. Google, Microsoft, and Meta have announced facilities totaling over 1,500 MW of new demand by 2028. BMW's Spartanburg plant expansion and other automotive manufacturing growth add industrial load.

Electric vehicle adoption remains below the national average but is climbing, particularly in Charleston and Columbia metro areas. State incentives and federal EV tax credits are beginning to drive uptake among affluent coastal residents.

Infrastructure Spending Pipeline

South Carolina utilities are investing heavily in grid modernization and generation replacement. Dominion Energy South Carolina is spending $2.1 billion through 2028 on transmission upgrades, smart grid technology, and storm hardening. Duke Energy Carolinas has committed $1.8 billion for similar improvements in their South Carolina service territory.

Solar development is expanding rapidly after years of regulatory constraints. The state's renewable portfolio standard, while modest, has opened doors for utility-scale projects. Over 2,000 MW of solar capacity is in development or recently completed, including the massive Camp Hall solar facility near Charleston.

Federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funding has allocated $109 million to South Carolina for grid resilience projects, focusing on rural electrification improvements and storm hardening. Additional Inflation Reduction Act tax credits are supporting the solar buildout and potential battery storage projects.

The most significant long-term question is nuclear fleet replacement. As existing plants near retirement in the 2030s and 2040s, South Carolina faces a choice between new nuclear construction, natural gas expansion, or a fundamental shift to renewables plus storage. Early planning suggests a mixed approach, but financing remains challenging after the V.C. Summer disaster.

What This Means for Investors

South Carolina's nuclear dependence creates both risk and opportunity for infrastructure investors. The state's stable baseload generation supports long-term power purchase agreements and predictable cash flows, but aging plants require massive capital commitments that strain utility balance sheets.

Utilities with South Carolina exposure — Dominion Energy (D), Duke Energy (DUK), and SCANA Corporation (now part of Dominion) — offer dividend yields around 4-5% but face regulatory pressure over nuclear cost recovery. The Utility Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) provides diversified exposure to these themes.

Solar and energy storage buildout creates opportunities in renewable infrastructure. NextEra Energy (NEE) and Brookfield Renewable Partners (BEP) have significant South Carolina solar development pipelines. The Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) captures broader solar sector growth driven by states like South Carolina transitioning from regulatory obstacles to renewable-friendly policies.

Grid modernization spending benefits equipment manufacturers. Schneider Electric, General Electric, and Eaton Corporation supply transmission equipment, smart grid technology, and backup power systems critical to South Carolina's infrastructure upgrades. The SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) includes exposure to grid modernization technologies.

Related Research

• URNM: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
• Cameco Corporation (CCJ) Tollbooth Analysis
• URA: Global X Uranium ETF
• NLR: VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF
• Alabama Power Grid Risk Assessment

Frequently Asked Questions

Is South Carolina's power grid reliable?

South Carolina's grid is generally reliable, supported by nuclear generation from Oconee, Catawba (shared with NC), Robinson, and Summer Unit 1. The state's proximity to Duke Energy's and Dominion's larger systems provides regional backup. However, the financial impact of the V.C. Summer Units 2 and 3 construction failure continues to burden ratepayers. Military installations including Fort Jackson, Shaw AFB, and Parris Island require highly reliable power supply.

What causes blackouts in South Carolina?

Hurricanes tracking along the Southeast coast are South Carolina's most significant blackout threat, with storms like Hugo (1989) and Florence (2018) causing widespread destruction. Summer thunderstorms and tornadoes cause frequent localized outages. Ice storms occasionally affect the upstate region, causing tree-related distribution damage. Flooding from coastal storms and inland rainfall can damage substations and underground infrastructure.

How is South Carolina investing in grid infrastructure?

Following the V.C. Summer failure, South Carolina's regulatory environment has become more cautious about large-scale generation investment. Dominion Energy South Carolina and Duke Energy are investing in solar generation and grid modernization. Distribution system hardening for hurricane resilience is an ongoing priority. The state's military installations are driving investment in microgrid technology for energy security. Natural gas generation is expanding to provide dispatchable capacity as coal plants retire.

What is South Carolina's energy mix?

South Carolina generates approximately 55% of its electricity from nuclear, making it one of the most nuclear-dependent states in the nation. Natural gas provides about 25%, with coal declining and solar growing rapidly. The state's high nuclear share provides low-carbon baseload generation and relatively low electricity prices. Solar development is accelerating, supported by good solar resources and declining costs. The V.C. Summer experience has made South Carolina cautious about new nuclear construction but committed to operating the existing fleet.

This analysis is part of Energy Macro's state-by-state grid infrastructure research. For our complete framework on positioning for the $14 trillion grid rebuild — including specific allocations and income strategies — see The Blackout Fortune Playbook.

Updated: February 1, 2026 | Data sources: EIA, FERC, SERC Reliability Corporation